CBP Ruling Database
Search past U.S. Customs and Border Protection classification rulings. Find precedent for your product and cite it in your own classification.
258320 rulings found
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
The tariff classification of a blouse for toddlers’ wear from Bangladesh
The tariff classification of a blouse for toddlers’ wear from Bangladesh
The tariff classification of a Textile Seat Strap for Airbag and a Seat Patch from Japan.
The tariff classification of a Textile Seat Strap for Airbag and a Seat Patch from Japan.
The tariff classification of a Modular Tradeshow Exhibit System from the United Kingdom.
The tariff classification of a Modular Tradeshow Exhibit System from the United Kingdom.
The tariff classification of a plastic clip strip from China.
The tariff classification of a plastic clip strip from China.
The tariff classification of a Fantasy Dress Up Tiara Accessory Set from China.
The tariff classification of a Fantasy Dress Up Tiara Accessory Set from China.
The tariff classification of a Portable CD Player from China.
The tariff classification of a Portable CD Player from China.
The tariff classification of a Monster Beam from China.
The tariff classification of a Monster Beam from China.
The tariff classification of a woman’s sleeveless cardigan from China
The tariff classification of a woman’s sleeveless cardigan from China
The tariff classification of gloves from China.
The tariff classification of gloves from China.
The tariff classification of gloves from China.
The tariff classification of gloves from China.
The tariff classification of cufflinks from the United Kingdom.
The tariff classification of cufflinks from the United Kingdom.
The tariff classification of footwear from China.
The tariff classification of footwear from China.
The tariff classification of footwear from Taiwan and Brazil.
The tariff classification of footwear from Taiwan and Brazil.
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear from China
The tariff classification of footwear made in China.
The tariff classification of footwear made in China.
The tariff classification of footwear made in China.
The tariff classification of footwear made in China.
The tariff classification of women's woven wearing apparel from the Philippines
The tariff classification of women's woven wearing apparel from the Philippines
The tariff classification of women's woven wearing apparel from the Philippines
The tariff classification of women's woven wearing apparel from the Philippines
The tariff classification of women's woven wearing apparel from the Philippines
The tariff classification of women's woven wearing apparel from the Philippines
The tariff classification of a calf jacket from China.
The tariff classification of a calf jacket from China.