Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Reasoning
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 959171 (4202926010): Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 420292
The tariff classification of pet carriers from China
The tariff classification of a camera bag and various camera accessories.
The tariff classification of an jewel box from Hong Kong
The tariff classification of a rolling pullman, a backpack, and tote bag
The tariff classification of a rolling pullman, a backpack, and tote bag