Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Reasoning
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 959171 (4202991000): Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 420299
The tariff classification of a molded plastic carrying case from China
The tariff classification of cellular telephone cases from China
The tariff classification of musical jewelry boxes from China
The tariff classification of jewelry boxes from China
The tariff classification of an iPad case from China