Reconsideration of NYRL 836464 of February 13, 1989
Reasoning
Reconsideration of NYRL 836464 of February 13, 1989
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 083800 (4202923030): Reconsideration of NYRL 836464 of February 13, 1989
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 420292
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1801-95-100002; 4202, HTSUSA; Jewelry Display Case; Treatment Dear Madam: This is a decision on an application for further review (AFR) of a protest timely filed on January 4, 1996, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Bufkor, Inc. The Protest concerns the classification, treatment and liquidation of four entries of jewelry display cases, manufactured in El Salvador and entered in January, February and March, 1995.
The tariff classification of Cinderella Pretty as a Princess Fashions from China.
The tariff classification of cosmetic and toiletry bags from China.