Application for further review of Protest No. 3004-92- 100070 under 19 U.S.C., section 1514(c)(2); paper; coated v. uncoated; Reprobond; Dillingham.
Reasoning
Application for further review of Protest No. 3004-92- 100070 under 19 U.S.C., section 1514(c)(2); paper; coated v. uncoated; Reprobond; Dillingham.
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 953244 (4806200000): Application for further review of Protest No. 3004-92- 100070 under 19 U.S.C., section 1514(c)(2); paper; coated v. uncoated; Reprobond; Dillingham.
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 480620
Protest Number 1303-97-100135; heading 4811; heading 4806; impregnated; coated;greaseproof papers
Revocation of NYRL 860858; classification of "Reprobond RC/01 60 gm2" paper from the United Kingdom; coated v. uncoated paper; Dillingham.
The tariff classification of Canson Satin papers, in several weights, from France.
The tariff classification of "Alipack" paper from France.