Application for Further Review of Protest 1401-04-100072 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 1401-04-100072, timely filed by Eternal Technology Corporation. FACTS: The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of one entry of photo-resist dry film under subheading 3707.90.3290 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Reasoning
Application for Further Review of Protest 1401-04-100072 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 1401-04-100072, timely filed by Eternal Technology Corporation. FACTS: The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of one entry of photo-resist dry film under subheading 3707.90.3290 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 967125 (3707903290): Application for Further Review of Protest 1401-04-100072 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 1401-04-100072, timely filed by Eternal Technology Corporation. FACTS: The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of one entry of photo-resist dry film under subheading 3707.90.3290 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 370790
Protest 1001-95-108250; Laser Printer Toner Cartridges; no moving parts; heading 8473; HQs 082357, 089122, 089260; Mita Copystar America v. U.S.
The tariff classification of toner bottles (cartridges) from Japan.
The tariff classification of IBIS SX Toner from England.
The tariff classification of Photographic Chemicals fromCanada.
Classification of a "Fusing Agent".