CBP Ruling Database

The tariff classification of glycerol-1-allylether fromGermany.

The tariff classification of Dipentaerythritol (CAS# 126-58-9) from India

The tariff classification of 3-methoxy phenethyl alcohol(CAS # 5020-41-7) from Japan.

The tariff classification of butynil chlorohydrinether fromGermany.

The tariff classification of Guaifenesin USP, LidocaineHydrochloride USP, and Lidocaine Base from Taiwan

and R' may be the same or different. You claim that since di-penta does not contain either an alkyl or an aryl group (althoughit does have the R-O-R structure), di-penta does not satisfy theENs definition of ethers and should not, therefore, be classifiedas such. You also point out that the ether content of di-pentaaccounts for none of its chemical activity; that the chemicalactivity displayed is entirely attributable to the hydroxylgroups characteristic of penta and polypentaerythritols. As aresult you suggest that di-penta be classified as polyhydricalcohol derived from sugars in subheading 2905.49.2000, HTSUS. This would be appropriate you believe as polyhydric alcohols arecompounds containing multiple OH groups, and di-penta containssix OH groups. You state that it is derived from formaldehyde,acetaldehyde, and an alkaline condensing agent, which combine tocreate pentaerythose, a sugar, with some formaldehyde left over;the sugar and formaldehyde then react to give a combination

and R' may be the same or different. You claim that since di-penta does not contain either an alkyl or an aryl group (althoughit does have the R-O-R structure), di-penta does not satisfy theENs definition of ethers and should not, therefore, be classifiedas such. You also point out that the ether content of di-pentaaccounts for none of its chemical activity; that the chemicalactivity displayed is entirely attributable to the hydroxylgroups characteristic of penta and polypentaerythritols. As aresult you suggest that di-penta be classified as polyhydricalcohol derived from sugars in subheading 2905.49.2000, HTSUS. This would be appropriate you believe as polyhydric alcohols arecompounds containing multiple OH groups, and di-penta containssix OH groups. You state that it is derived from formaldehyde,acetaldehyde, and an alkaline condensing agent, which combine tocreate pentaerythose, a sugar, with some formaldehyde left over;the sugar and formaldehyde then react to give a combination

The tariff classification of Benzyloxy-3-chloro-2-propanol (CAS # 103024-85-7) from England

The tariff classification of Benzyloxy-3-Chloro-2-Propanol (CAS # 103024-85-7) from England

The tariff classification of Triethylene glycol monoethyl ether (CAS # 112-50-5) from Japan

The tariff classification of DI-TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE (DiTMP) (CAS # 23235-61-2) from Sweden

The tariff classification of 2-(2-Chloroethoxy)ethanol (CAS # 628-89-7) from Japan

The tariff classification of Hexaethylene glycol, CAS 2615-15-8 from Japan

The tariff classification of Ethyl Proxitol, CAS # 1569-02-4, imported in bulk form, from the United Kingdom

The tariff classification of Ethoxy propanol, imported in bulk form, from the United Kingdom

The tariff classification of Diluent M Solvent, CAS # 56539-66-3, imported in bulk form, from Japan

The tariff classification of Triethylene glycol monoethyl ether, CAS # 112-50-5, imported in bulk form, from the United Kingdom

The tariff classification of Acetaminophen USP (CAS-103-90-2), Brompheniramine Maleate USP (CAS-980-71-2), Guaifenesin USP (CAS-93-14-1); Methocarbamol USP (CAS-532-03-6); and Metformin Hydrochloride USP (CAS-1115-70-4), imported in bulk form, from India

The tariff classification of Ethylene glycol bis (m-tolyl ether), CAS No. 54914-85-1 from Japan

The tariff classification of Microcare® CPH

The tariff classification of Ethyl Proxitol, CAS No. 1569-02-4 from Netherlands

The tariff classification of Dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether, CAS 111109-77-4, from China

The tariff classification of 2-phenoxyethanol from China