Request to set aside denial of Application for Further Review, Protest No. 2704-05-101169; 19 U.S.C. 1515(c); 19 CFR 174.24 Dear Mr. Harris: This is in reply to your request of September 6, 2005, on behalf of your client, Clark International Services, for Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") to set aside the denial of your Application for Further Review (AFR) and to void the denial of Protest No. 2704-05-101169. The request was timely filed within 60 days after the date of the notice of denial. FACTS: The protest at issue is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) Notice of Redelivery of one entry of multi-layer bonded fabric which CBP classified under subheading 6001.22.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Reasoning
Request to set aside denial of Application for Further Review, Protest No. 2704-05-101169; 19 U.S.C. 1515(c); 19 CFR 174.24 Dear Mr. Harris: This is in reply to your request of September 6, 2005, on behalf of your client, Clark International Services, for Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") to set aside the denial of your Application for Further Review (AFR) and to void the denial of Protest No. 2704-05-101169. The request was timely filed within 60 days after the date of the notice of denial. FACTS: The protest at issue is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) Notice of Redelivery of one entry of multi-layer bonded fabric which CBP classified under subheading 6001.22.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 967890 (60012200): Request to set aside denial of Application for Further Review, Protest No. 2704-05-101169; 19 U.S.C. 1515(c); 19 CFR 174.24 Dear Mr. Harris: This is in reply to your request of September 6, 2005, on behalf of your client, Clark International Services, for Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") to set aside the denial of your Application for Further Review (AFR) and to void the denial of Protest No. 2704-05-101169. The request was timely filed within 60 days after the date of the notice of denial. FACTS: The protest at issue is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) Notice of Redelivery of one entry of multi-layer bonded fabric which CBP classified under subheading 6001.22.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 600122
The tariff classification of knit pile fleece fabric from Canada.
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.1704-93-100076; granted; classification of adhesive-backed nylonknit fabric used for attaching breast protheses proper undersubheading 9802.00.80, HTSUSA.
The tariff classification of one knit pile fabric and two rib knit fabrics from Singapore.
The tariff classification of three knit pile fabrics, one jersey knit fabric and one knitted collar from Singapore.
Request for Reconsideration of NYRL 876168; hook and loop fabric; Note 1 and 2(a) to chapter 59, HTSUSA, visible to naked eye; Note 5 to chapter 58, HTSUSA; EN A(2) to heading 5806, narrow woven fabric, false selvage; subheadings 5806.10.2000 and 6001.22.0000, HTSUSA