Request to set aside denial of Application for Further Review, Protest No. 5201-05-100045; 19 U.S.C. 1515(c); 19 CFR 174.24 Dear Mr. Feldman: This is in reply to your request of September 6, 2005, on behalf of your client, TY, TY, TY, Inc., for Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") to set aside the denial of your Application for Further Review (AFR) and to void the denial of Protest No. 5201-05-100045. The request was timely filed within 60 days after the date of the notice of denial. FACTS: The protest at issue is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) assessment of marking duties on one entry of slippers, laundry bags and newspaper bags.

Reasoning

Request to set aside denial of Application for Further Review, Protest No. 5201-05-100045; 19 U.S.C. 1515(c); 19 CFR 174.24 Dear Mr. Feldman: This is in reply to your request of September 6, 2005, on behalf of your client, TY, TY, TY, Inc., for Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") to set aside the denial of your Application for Further Review (AFR) and to void the denial of Protest No. 5201-05-100045. The request was timely filed within 60 days after the date of the notice of denial. FACTS: The protest at issue is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) assessment of marking duties on one entry of slippers, laundry bags and newspaper bags.

Cite this ruling

CBP Ruling 967977 (60012200): Request to set aside denial of Application for Further Review, Protest No. 5201-05-100045; 19 U.S.C. 1515(c); 19 CFR 174.24 Dear Mr. Feldman: This is in reply to your request of September 6, 2005, on behalf of your client, TY, TY, TY, Inc., for Customs and Border Protection ("CBP") to set aside the denial of your Application for Further Review (AFR) and to void the denial of Protest No. 5201-05-100045. The request was timely filed within 60 days after the date of the notice of denial. FACTS: The protest at issue is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) assessment of marking duties on one entry of slippers, laundry bags and newspaper bags.

Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.

Other rulings for HS6 600122