Internal Advice Request No. 05/013; Classification of "Just Married" Car & Window Clings.Dear Port Director:This ruling is in response to a request for Internal Advice initiated by Evans and Wood & Co., Inc., on behalf of their client, Hobby Lobby Stores. At issue is the proper classification of "Just Married" car and window clings. The request for Internal Advice stems from an entry of car and window clings classified at the time of entry in subheading 3919.90.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). You now believe that the clings should be classified in subheading 4911.91.4040, HTSUSA. The request for internal advice is sought based on the importer’s disagreement with the proposed classification. The importer asserts that classification is proper in subheading 9505.90.6000, HTSUSA. A sample has been sent with the request. FACTS:At issue is a five-piece retail package of static-cling "just married" window and car cling signs printed

Cite this ruling

CBP Ruling 967807 (9505906000): Internal Advice Request No. 05/013; Classification of "Just Married" Car & Window Clings.Dear Port Director:This ruling is in response to a request for Internal Advice initiated by Evans and Wood & Co., Inc., on behalf of their client, Hobby Lobby Stores. At issue is the proper classification of "Just Married" car and window clings. The request for Internal Advice stems from an entry of car and window clings classified at the time of entry in subheading 3919.90.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). You now believe that the clings should be classified in subheading 4911.91.4040, HTSUSA. The request for internal advice is sought based on the importer’s disagreement with the proposed classification. The importer asserts that classification is proper in subheading 9505.90.6000, HTSUSA. A sample has been sent with the request. FACTS:At issue is a five-piece retail package of static-cling "just married" window and car cling signs printed

Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.