The tariff classification of four man-made fiber fabrics from China.

Reasoning

The tariff classification of four man-made fiber fabrics from China.

Cite this ruling

CBP Ruling N014254 (5903903090): The tariff classification of four man-made fiber fabrics from China.

Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.

Other rulings for HS6 590390

The tariff classification of five plastic coated textile fabrics, for manufacture into washed or distressed-look garments, from Italy.

The tariff classification of a woven upholstery fabric containing a light back coating with acrylics plastic, from Indonesia.

The tariff classification of ink jet media canvas, from Japan

erence to your letter of December 3, 2001, on behalf of Rockland Industries, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruing Letter (NY) H81427, dated August 15, 2001, regarding the classification of woven textile blackout drapery lining material under the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). Your letter, which was originally submitted to the Customs National Commodity Specialist Division in New York, was referred to this office for reply. After review of NY H81427, Customs has determined that the classification of the blackout drapery lining material in subheading 5903.90.2500, HTSUSA, was correct. For the reasons that follow, this ruling affirms NY H81427.

erence to your letter of December 3, 2001, on behalf of Rockland Industries, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruing Letter (NY) H81427, dated August 15, 2001, regarding the classification of woven textile blackout drapery lining material under the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). Your letter, which was originally submitted to the Customs National Commodity Specialist Division in New York, was referred to this office for reply. After review of NY H81427, Customs has determined that the classification of the blackout drapery lining material in subheading 5903.90.2500, HTSUSA, was correct. For the reasons that follow, this ruling affirms NY H81427.