NYRL 876026 (9/14/92) affirmed; a ruling letter will be appliedto subsequent transactions only if the articles the subject of thelater importations are identical to the merchandise classified inthe original ruling; 19 CFR 177.9(b); applicability of a ruling toa transaction is contingent on the facts; absent a showing thatCustoms failed to utilize proper testing procedures, a presumptionexists that the Customs laboratory results are correct; Exxon Corp.v. United States, 462 F. Supp. 378, 81 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 4772(October 16, 1978); Customs lab results control classification anddetermine applicability of previously issued rulings.

Reasoning

NYRL 876026 (9/14/92) affirmed; a ruling letter will be appliedto subsequent transactions only if the articles the subject of thelater importations are identical to the merchandise classified inthe original ruling; 19 CFR 177.9(b); applicability of a ruling toa transaction is contingent on the facts; absent a showing thatCustoms failed to utilize proper testing procedures, a presumptionexists that the Customs laboratory results are correct; Exxon Corp.v. United States, 462 F. Supp. 378, 81 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 4772(October 16, 1978); Customs lab results control classification anddetermine applicability of previously issued rulings.

Cite this ruling

CBP Ruling 955909 (6201933000): NYRL 876026 (9/14/92) affirmed; a ruling letter will be appliedto subsequent transactions only if the articles the subject of thelater importations are identical to the merchandise classified inthe original ruling; 19 CFR 177.9(b); applicability of a ruling toa transaction is contingent on the facts; absent a showing thatCustoms failed to utilize proper testing procedures, a presumptionexists that the Customs laboratory results are correct; Exxon Corp.v. United States, 462 F. Supp. 378, 81 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 4772(October 16, 1978); Customs lab results control classification anddetermine applicability of previously issued rulings.

Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.

Other rulings for HS6 620193