PRD 1303-94-100253; Parts of Machines for Working Rubber or Plastics or for the Manufacture of Products From These Materials; Parts of Machine Tools for Working Hard Rubber, Hard Plastics or Similar Hard Materials; Denial of Protest for Failure to Provide Evidence in Support of Claim, 19 CFR 174.13(a)(6) Dear District Director: This is our decision on Protest No. 1303-94-100253, filedagainst your classification of certain machine parts. The entryunder protest was liquidated on August 5, 1994, and this protest timely filed on September 1, 1994. Under 19 U.S.C. 1514(c)(1), a protest of a decision under subsection (a) of section 1514 must set forth distinctly and specifically each decision as to which protest is made. In addition, the Customs Regulations require that a protest set forth the nat

Reasoning

PRD 1303-94-100253; Parts of Machines for Working Rubber or Plastics or for the Manufacture of Products From These Materials; Parts of Machine Tools for Working Hard Rubber, Hard Plastics or Similar Hard Materials; Denial of Protest for Failure to Provide Evidence in Support of Claim, 19 CFR 174.13(a)(6) Dear District Director: This is our decision on Protest No. 1303-94-100253, filedagainst your classification of certain machine parts. The entryunder protest was liquidated on August 5, 1994, and this protest timely filed on September 1, 1994. Under 19 U.S.C. 1514(c)(1), a protest of a decision under subsection (a) of section 1514 must set forth distinctly and specifically each decision as to which protest is made. In addition, the Customs Regulations require that a protest set forth the nat

Cite this ruling

CBP Ruling 957650 (84669390): PRD 1303-94-100253; Parts of Machines for Working Rubber or Plastics or for the Manufacture of Products From These Materials; Parts of Machine Tools for Working Hard Rubber, Hard Plastics or Similar Hard Materials; Denial of Protest for Failure to Provide Evidence in Support of Claim, 19 CFR 174.13(a)(6) Dear District Director: This is our decision on Protest No. 1303-94-100253, filedagainst your classification of certain machine parts. The entryunder protest was liquidated on August 5, 1994, and this protest timely filed on September 1, 1994. Under 19 U.S.C. 1514(c)(1), a protest of a decision under subsection (a) of section 1514 must set forth distinctly and specifically each decision as to which protest is made. In addition, the Customs Regulations require that a protest set forth the nat

Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.

Other rulings for HS6 846693