Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1001-94-105178,filed July 22, 1994, concerning the classification of applepuree, pear puree, peach puree, and plum puree. Dear Sir:
Reasoning
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1001-94-105178,filed July 22, 1994, concerning the classification of applepuree, pear puree, peach puree, and plum puree. Dear Sir:
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 957039 (2007994800): Application for Further Review of Protest No. 1001-94-105178,filed July 22, 1994, concerning the classification of applepuree, pear puree, peach puree, and plum puree. Dear Sir:
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 200799
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4909-94-100064,filed August 15, 1994, concerning the classification of pearpuree. Dear Sir:
The tariff classification and country of origin marking of fruit preparations from Finland
The tariff classification and country of origin marking of fruit preparations from Finland
The tariff classification of black currant preserves fromFrance
The tariff classification of fruit preserves from France