Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.1001-95-105534; women's espadrilles; Note 4(b) to Chapter 64,HTSUSA; heat molded-on rubber outer sole is not a protectoror attachment; lace straps serve a functional purpose
Reasoning
Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.1001-95-105534; women's espadrilles; Note 4(b) to Chapter 64,HTSUSA; heat molded-on rubber outer sole is not a protectoror attachment; lace straps serve a functional purpose
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 958550 (64041980): Decision on Application for Further Review of Protest No.1001-95-105534; women's espadrilles; Note 4(b) to Chapter 64,HTSUSA; heat molded-on rubber outer sole is not a protectoror attachment; lace straps serve a functional purpose
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 640419
The tariff classification of a beach tote with thongs fromHong Kong.
The tariff classification of four women's shoes fromUruguay.
The tariff classification of a women's high heel shoe fromChina.
The tariff classification of slippers from Brazil. Dear Ms. Dias: In your letter, no date shown, and received in this office April1, 1991, you requested a classification ruling.
The tariff classification of a woman's slipper from China. Dear Mr. Andrade: In your letter dated March 5, 1991, you requested a classificationruling.