Reconsideration of NY A87907; "PurseGuard" Alarm with Carrying Case; Not Composite Good or Set; Not GRI 5(a) Container Dear Mr. Mlawski:
Reasoning
Reconsideration of NY A87907; "PurseGuard" Alarm with Carrying Case; Not Composite Good or Set; Not GRI 5(a) Container Dear Mr. Mlawski:
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 960046 (8531808040): Reconsideration of NY A87907; "PurseGuard" Alarm with Carrying Case; Not Composite Good or Set; Not GRI 5(a) Container Dear Mr. Mlawski:
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 853180
The tariff classification of a pager from Japan
PRD 3901-97-101905; Monitoring Equipment Used With Material Handling Elevators and Conveyors; Conveyor Belt Monitoring Devices, Level Monitors for Liquids and Free-Flowing Granular Solids; Parts, Accessories; Electrical Machines and Apparatus Having Individual Functions n.s.i.e.; HQ 956031, HQ 956883, HQ 958076
The tariff classification of a CAX-45 strobe light from Taiwan.
The tariff classification of a "Parking Sentry" from Taiwan
The tariff classification of a battery operated signal device from Japan