The classification of garments from Philippines.Dear Ms. Torbati: In your letter of February 16, 1999, you requested a tariff classification ruling. Sample of style 03190 was submitted for classification.Style 03190 is composed of 100% cotton corduroy fabric. The garment, a pair of womentrousers, features a zippered frontal opening with a button closure, two front pockets and two buttoned rear pockets.The applicable subheading for the garment is 6204.62.4005, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, which provides for women cotton corduroy trousers. The rate of duty is 17.2%. The garment falls into textile category 348. As products of Philippines, this merchandise is presently subject to visa requirements based on international trade agreements and subject to quota reporting.The designated textile and apparel category may be subdivided into parts. If so, visa and quota requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected. Since part categories are the result

Cite this ruling

CBP Ruling D87938 (6204624005): The classification of garments from Philippines.Dear Ms. Torbati: In your letter of February 16, 1999, you requested a tariff classification ruling. Sample of style 03190 was submitted for classification.Style 03190 is composed of 100% cotton corduroy fabric. The garment, a pair of womentrousers, features a zippered frontal opening with a button closure, two front pockets and two buttoned rear pockets.The applicable subheading for the garment is 6204.62.4005, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, which provides for women cotton corduroy trousers. The rate of duty is 17.2%. The garment falls into textile category 348. As products of Philippines, this merchandise is presently subject to visa requirements based on international trade agreements and subject to quota reporting.The designated textile and apparel category may be subdivided into parts. If so, visa and quota requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected. Since part categories are the result

Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.