The classification of garments from Hong KongDear Ms. Raffa: In your letter of March 8, 1999, you requested a tariff classification ruling. Sample of style 22257 was submitted for classification.Style 22257 is composed of 100% knit boiled wool fabric. The garment extends from the shoulders to the area mid thigh. It features a full frontal zipped opening, a hood and two pockets below the waist. Your sample is being returned to you.The applicable subheading for the garment is 6110.10.2030, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, which provides for womens wool knit sweaters. The rate of duty is 16.5%. The garment falls into textile category 446. As products of Hong Kong, this merchandise is presently subject to visa requirements based on international trade agreements and subject to quota reporting.The designated textile and apparel category may be subdivided into parts. If so, visa and quota requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected. Since part cat

Cite this ruling

CBP Ruling D89238 (6110102030): The classification of garments from Hong KongDear Ms. Raffa: In your letter of March 8, 1999, you requested a tariff classification ruling. Sample of style 22257 was submitted for classification.Style 22257 is composed of 100% knit boiled wool fabric. The garment extends from the shoulders to the area mid thigh. It features a full frontal zipped opening, a hood and two pockets below the waist. Your sample is being returned to you.The applicable subheading for the garment is 6110.10.2030, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, which provides for womens wool knit sweaters. The rate of duty is 16.5%. The garment falls into textile category 446. As products of Hong Kong, this merchandise is presently subject to visa requirements based on international trade agreements and subject to quota reporting.The designated textile and apparel category may be subdivided into parts. If so, visa and quota requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected. Since part cat

Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.