Reconsideration of NY G89437; Replacement plastic face shields for motorcycle helmets Dear Mr. Rubinson: This is in reference to your letter, dated May 1, 2001, to the National Commodity Specialist Division, New York, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter ("NY") G89437, dated April 11, 2001, regarding the classification of replacement plastic face shields for motorcycle helmets, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Your letter, together with a catalog page illustrating the face shield, was forwarded to this office for reply. We regret the delay in responding.

Reasoning

Reconsideration of NY G89437; Replacement plastic face shields for motorcycle helmets Dear Mr. Rubinson: This is in reference to your letter, dated May 1, 2001, to the National Commodity Specialist Division, New York, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter ("NY") G89437, dated April 11, 2001, regarding the classification of replacement plastic face shields for motorcycle helmets, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Your letter, together with a catalog page illustrating the face shield, was forwarded to this office for reply. We regret the delay in responding.

Cite this ruling

CBP Ruling 965090 (39269098): Reconsideration of NY G89437; Replacement plastic face shields for motorcycle helmets Dear Mr. Rubinson: This is in reference to your letter, dated May 1, 2001, to the National Commodity Specialist Division, New York, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter ("NY") G89437, dated April 11, 2001, regarding the classification of replacement plastic face shields for motorcycle helmets, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Your letter, together with a catalog page illustrating the face shield, was forwarded to this office for reply. We regret the delay in responding.

Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.

Other rulings for HS6 392690