erence to your letter of December 3, 2001, on behalf of Rockland Industries, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruing Letter (NY) H81427, dated August 15, 2001, regarding the classification of woven textile blackout drapery lining material under the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). Your letter, which was originally submitted to the Customs National Commodity Specialist Division in New York, was referred to this office for reply. After review of NY H81427, Customs has determined that the classification of the blackout drapery lining material in subheading 5903.90.2500, HTSUSA, was correct. For the reasons that follow, this ruling affirms NY H81427.
Reasoning
erence to your letter of December 3, 2001, on behalf of Rockland Industries, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruing Letter (NY) H81427, dated August 15, 2001, regarding the classification of woven textile blackout drapery lining material under the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). Your letter, which was originally submitted to the Customs National Commodity Specialist Division in New York, was referred to this office for reply. After review of NY H81427, Customs has determined that the classification of the blackout drapery lining material in subheading 5903.90.2500, HTSUSA, was correct. For the reasons that follow, this ruling affirms NY H81427.
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 965343 (5903902500): erence to your letter of December 3, 2001, on behalf of Rockland Industries, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruing Letter (NY) H81427, dated August 15, 2001, regarding the classification of woven textile blackout drapery lining material under the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA). Your letter, which was originally submitted to the Customs National Commodity Specialist Division in New York, was referred to this office for reply. After review of NY H81427, Customs has determined that the classification of the blackout drapery lining material in subheading 5903.90.2500, HTSUSA, was correct. For the reasons that follow, this ruling affirms NY H81427.
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 590390
Revocation of NYRL 891702 (11/19/93); classification ofcoated fabric; Note 2(a)(1) to Chapter 59; heading 5903, HTSUSA;coating rendered visible to the naked eye if manually separablefrom underlying fabric.
Modification of HRL 958462 (11/2/95); issuance of a de novobinding classification ruling inappropriate where the recipientpreviously was issued a conflicting unrevoked ruling on theidentical merchandise; coated fabric.
The tariff classification of woven fabric from Thailand.
Classification of coated fabric; Note 2(a)(1) to Chapter 59; heading 5903, HTSUSA; coatingvisible if separable from underlying fabric; HRL 953937 (12/17/93); 956772 (12/9/94); 953937(12/17/93); 956946 (4/6/95).
The tariff classification of QLS Ultra greenhouse/agricultural screening material, from Sweden.