Application for Further Review of Protest Number 3501-97-100022; Classification of Stained Crate and Slat Bottom Box: Packing Container vs. Decorative: Heading 4415 Dear Sir: This is in response to the request for further review of Protest No. 3501-97-100022, timely field on February 19, 1997, by the Fritz Companies, Inc. on behalf of its client, Tsumura International Inc., against a rate advance. The protest involves two styles of wooden boxes, which were entered on June 3, 1996.
Reasoning
Application for Further Review of Protest Number 3501-97-100022; Classification of Stained Crate and Slat Bottom Box: Packing Container vs. Decorative: Heading 4415 Dear Sir: This is in response to the request for further review of Protest No. 3501-97-100022, timely field on February 19, 1997, by the Fritz Companies, Inc. on behalf of its client, Tsumura International Inc., against a rate advance. The protest involves two styles of wooden boxes, which were entered on June 3, 1996.
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 961072 (44151090): Application for Further Review of Protest Number 3501-97-100022; Classification of Stained Crate and Slat Bottom Box: Packing Container vs. Decorative: Heading 4415 Dear Sir: This is in response to the request for further review of Protest No. 3501-97-100022, timely field on February 19, 1997, by the Fritz Companies, Inc. on behalf of its client, Tsumura International Inc., against a rate advance. The protest involves two styles of wooden boxes, which were entered on June 3, 1996.
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 441510
The tariff classification of wooden sea urchin trays from Korea
The tariff classification of unassembled unfinished collapsible woodpacking boxes from Spain
The tariff classification of wooden crates for bottled toiletries from China
The tariff classification of a wooden slotted box from China
The tariff classification of a wood packing container similar to a wooden tray from Taiwan