Request for reconsideration of NY J82595, dated May 5, 2003, concerning the classification of a "Vest for Snore Prevention" Dear Ms. Ikeda: This is in reply to your letter of May 19, 2003, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) J82595, dated May 5, 2003. A sample was submitted for our examination. It will be returned per your request. FACTS: The sample at issue is a "Vest for Snore Prevention". It is a 100% cotton knit fabric vest with large armholes and a left over right full front four-snap closure. The interior rear portion of the vest features a zippered pouch which is designed to fit an inflatable article measuring approximately 6 ½ x 23 inches. You state that the vest and inflatable article are worn together to prevent sleep disorders by forcing wearers to sleep on their side. The vest is registered with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a snoring preventative medical device. ISSUE: Whether the merchandise at issue is classi
Reasoning
Request for reconsideration of NY J82595, dated May 5, 2003, concerning the classification of a "Vest for Snore Prevention" Dear Ms. Ikeda: This is in reply to your letter of May 19, 2003, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) J82595, dated May 5, 2003. A sample was submitted for our examination. It will be returned per your request. FACTS: The sample at issue is a "Vest for Snore Prevention". It is a 100% cotton knit fabric vest with large armholes and a left over right full front four-snap closure. The interior rear portion of the vest features a zippered pouch which is designed to fit an inflatable article measuring approximately 6 ½ x 23 inches. You state that the vest and inflatable article are worn together to prevent sleep disorders by forcing wearers to sleep on their side. The vest is registered with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a snoring preventative medical device. ISSUE: Whether the merchandise at issue is classi
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 966521 (6110202030): Request for reconsideration of NY J82595, dated May 5, 2003, concerning the classification of a "Vest for Snore Prevention" Dear Ms. Ikeda: This is in reply to your letter of May 19, 2003, requesting reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) J82595, dated May 5, 2003. A sample was submitted for our examination. It will be returned per your request. FACTS: The sample at issue is a "Vest for Snore Prevention". It is a 100% cotton knit fabric vest with large armholes and a left over right full front four-snap closure. The interior rear portion of the vest features a zippered pouch which is designed to fit an inflatable article measuring approximately 6 ½ x 23 inches. You state that the vest and inflatable article are worn together to prevent sleep disorders by forcing wearers to sleep on their side. The vest is registered with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a snoring preventative medical device. ISSUE: Whether the merchandise at issue is classi
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 611020
The tariff classification of women’s garments from China
The tariff classification of a woman’s cardigan-style garment from China
The tariff classification of a men’s pullover and women’s beach cover-ups from India.
The tariff classification of men’s and boys’ sweatshirts from Pakistan.
The tariff classification of a woman’s pullover from Pakistan