Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-102615Dear Port Director:This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-102615, timely filed by Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., on behalf of Camps Bay Manufacturing. FACTS:The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of three entries of men’s and boy’s knit shirts under subheadings 6105.10.0030, 6105.20.2010 and 6105.10.0010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Reasoning
Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-102615Dear Port Director:This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-102615, timely filed by Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., on behalf of Camps Bay Manufacturing. FACTS:The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of three entries of men’s and boy’s knit shirts under subheadings 6105.10.0030, 6105.20.2010 and 6105.10.0010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 966810 (6105202010): Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-102615Dear Port Director:This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-102615, timely filed by Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., on behalf of Camps Bay Manufacturing. FACTS:The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of three entries of men’s and boy’s knit shirts under subheadings 6105.10.0030, 6105.20.2010 and 6105.10.0010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.