African Growth and Opportunity Act; Findings and Trimmings; Lesser Developed Country; Swaziland Dear Ms. Weiss: This is in response to your letter dated October 2, 2003, on behalf of your client, Leonard Feinberg, Inc., requesting a binding ruling on the eligibility of four women’s garments for preferential treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Two of the garments have been ruled upon under NY J88419, dated October 3, 2003. The issue of the eligibility of two pairs of women’s shorts, Styles 200734 and Style 5065261, has been referred to this office for a direct response to you. Samples of the garments were submitted to our office for our consideration. FACTS: At issue are two samples of women’s shorts, constructed from 60 percent cotton and 40 percent polyester knit fabric. We note, however, with regard to the submitted samples, that the cardboard tag on Style 200734 reads "cotton" and the cardboard tag on Style 5065261 reads "100% polyester."
Reasoning
African Growth and Opportunity Act; Findings and Trimmings; Lesser Developed Country; Swaziland Dear Ms. Weiss: This is in response to your letter dated October 2, 2003, on behalf of your client, Leonard Feinberg, Inc., requesting a binding ruling on the eligibility of four women’s garments for preferential treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Two of the garments have been ruled upon under NY J88419, dated October 3, 2003. The issue of the eligibility of two pairs of women’s shorts, Styles 200734 and Style 5065261, has been referred to this office for a direct response to you. Samples of the garments were submitted to our office for our consideration. FACTS: At issue are two samples of women’s shorts, constructed from 60 percent cotton and 40 percent polyester knit fabric. We note, however, with regard to the submitted samples, that the cardboard tag on Style 200734 reads "cotton" and the cardboard tag on Style 5065261 reads "100% polyester."
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 966805 (98191112): African Growth and Opportunity Act; Findings and Trimmings; Lesser Developed Country; Swaziland Dear Ms. Weiss: This is in response to your letter dated October 2, 2003, on behalf of your client, Leonard Feinberg, Inc., requesting a binding ruling on the eligibility of four women’s garments for preferential treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Two of the garments have been ruled upon under NY J88419, dated October 3, 2003. The issue of the eligibility of two pairs of women’s shorts, Styles 200734 and Style 5065261, has been referred to this office for a direct response to you. Samples of the garments were submitted to our office for our consideration. FACTS: At issue are two samples of women’s shorts, constructed from 60 percent cotton and 40 percent polyester knit fabric. We note, however, with regard to the submitted samples, that the cardboard tag on Style 200734 reads "cotton" and the cardboard tag on Style 5065261 reads "100% polyester."
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 981911
The tariff classification and status under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) of women’s knit sports bra from Lesotho
The tariff classification of personalized stoles from Ghana
The tariff classification and status under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) of infants’ and boy’s rash guard pullovers and unisex jumpsuits from Mauritius
The tariff classification and status under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) for infants’ and girls’ swimsuits from Mauritius
The tariff classification and status under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) of an infant’s hooded towel, a poncho style beach robe and infants’ hats from Mauritius