Application for Further Review of Protest No. 5201-02-100807; Classification of Certain Men’s Garments; Sleepwear vs. Loungewear Dear Sir: This is in response to the request for further review of Protest No. 5201-02-100807 timely filed on September 30, 2002, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, on behalf of their client, Wilk Shirt Corp. (Wilk), against liquidation of certain men's garments as lounge pants of heading 6203, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The protest involves five styles of garments which were entered between June 4, 2001 and February 26, 2002. When entered, the garments were classified as pajamas. A supplemental information letter was submitted to the port claiming the garments should have been entered as other sleepwear. In a Request For Information dated April 9, 2002, Wilk was asked to submit documentation in support of its claim that the imported garments were sleep pants. After submissions by Wilk, a meeting with their attorney, and an ex
Reasoning
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 5201-02-100807; Classification of Certain Men’s Garments; Sleepwear vs. Loungewear Dear Sir: This is in response to the request for further review of Protest No. 5201-02-100807 timely filed on September 30, 2002, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, on behalf of their client, Wilk Shirt Corp. (Wilk), against liquidation of certain men's garments as lounge pants of heading 6203, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The protest involves five styles of garments which were entered between June 4, 2001 and February 26, 2002. When entered, the garments were classified as pajamas. A supplemental information letter was submitted to the port claiming the garments should have been entered as other sleepwear. In a Request For Information dated April 9, 2002, Wilk was asked to submit documentation in support of its claim that the imported garments were sleep pants. After submissions by Wilk, a meeting with their attorney, and an ex
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 966345 (6203424015): Application for Further Review of Protest No. 5201-02-100807; Classification of Certain Men’s Garments; Sleepwear vs. Loungewear Dear Sir: This is in response to the request for further review of Protest No. 5201-02-100807 timely filed on September 30, 2002, by Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, on behalf of their client, Wilk Shirt Corp. (Wilk), against liquidation of certain men's garments as lounge pants of heading 6203, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The protest involves five styles of garments which were entered between June 4, 2001 and February 26, 2002. When entered, the garments were classified as pajamas. A supplemental information letter was submitted to the port claiming the garments should have been entered as other sleepwear. In a Request For Information dated April 9, 2002, Wilk was asked to submit documentation in support of its claim that the imported garments were sleep pants. After submissions by Wilk, a meeting with their attorney, and an ex
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 620342
The tariff classification of men’s woven lounge pants from China.
The tariff classification of men’s woven pants from Cambodia.
The tariff classification of men’s woven shorts from China.
The tariff classification of boy’s trousers with detachable bib from China.
The tariff classification of men’s shorts from Egypt.