Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-102840 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-102840, filed by Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt, LLP, on behalf of Oved Apparel. In written submissions and in a telephone conference between members of my staff and counsel for the protestant on January 6, 2004, the protestant claims the subject merchandise is eligible for preferential treatment under the AGOA. The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of eight entries of men’s and boy’s knit pullovers under subheadings 6110.20.2065 and men’s knit shirts under subheading 6105.10.0010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Reasoning
Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-102840 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-102840, filed by Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt, LLP, on behalf of Oved Apparel. In written submissions and in a telephone conference between members of my staff and counsel for the protestant on January 6, 2004, the protestant claims the subject merchandise is eligible for preferential treatment under the AGOA. The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of eight entries of men’s and boy’s knit pullovers under subheadings 6110.20.2065 and men’s knit shirts under subheading 6105.10.0010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 966762 (6105100010): Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-102840 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-102840, filed by Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt, LLP, on behalf of Oved Apparel. In written submissions and in a telephone conference between members of my staff and counsel for the protestant on January 6, 2004, the protestant claims the subject merchandise is eligible for preferential treatment under the AGOA. The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of eight entries of men’s and boy’s knit pullovers under subheadings 6110.20.2065 and men’s knit shirts under subheading 6105.10.0010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 610510
The tariff classification of men’s knit pullover garments from Korea, Peru and Saipan.
The tariff classification of men’s’ knit garments from Saipan and Korea.
The Tariff Classification of a Boys’ Cotton/Polyester Knit Shirt from Oman, United Arab Emirates
The tariff classification of a men’s knit shirt from Malaysia. Ms. Lynne CooperAsics Tiger Corporation16275 Laguna Canyon RoadIrvine, CA 92618
The tariff classification of a men’s knit shirt from South Africa. Ms. Jennifer ScottExpeditors International of Washington, Inc.21318 64th Ave. SouthKent, WA 98032