Reconsideration of NY K80149; Classification of footwear from China Dear Mr. Pellegrini: This letter is in response to your request of January 13, 2004, on behalf of your client, Reebok, for reconsideration of NY K80149, dated November 12, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of athletic footwear from China. A sample athletic shoe was submitted with your request. In preparing this decision, consideration was given to the conference held between you and members of my staff on March 31, 2004. FACTS: In New York Ruling Letter (NY) K80149, dated November 12, 2003, athletic footwear identified as "ATR Flare" was classified in subheading 6402.91.90, HTSUSA, the provision for "Other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics: Other footwear: Covering the ankle: Other: Valued over $12/pair." The determination was based upon an examination of a sample identified as the "ATR Flare" and a fin
Reasoning
Reconsideration of NY K80149; Classification of footwear from China Dear Mr. Pellegrini: This letter is in response to your request of January 13, 2004, on behalf of your client, Reebok, for reconsideration of NY K80149, dated November 12, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of athletic footwear from China. A sample athletic shoe was submitted with your request. In preparing this decision, consideration was given to the conference held between you and members of my staff on March 31, 2004. FACTS: In New York Ruling Letter (NY) K80149, dated November 12, 2003, athletic footwear identified as "ATR Flare" was classified in subheading 6402.91.90, HTSUSA, the provision for "Other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics: Other footwear: Covering the ankle: Other: Valued over $12/pair." The determination was based upon an examination of a sample identified as the "ATR Flare" and a fin
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 966900 (64029190): Reconsideration of NY K80149; Classification of footwear from China Dear Mr. Pellegrini: This letter is in response to your request of January 13, 2004, on behalf of your client, Reebok, for reconsideration of NY K80149, dated November 12, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of athletic footwear from China. A sample athletic shoe was submitted with your request. In preparing this decision, consideration was given to the conference held between you and members of my staff on March 31, 2004. FACTS: In New York Ruling Letter (NY) K80149, dated November 12, 2003, athletic footwear identified as "ATR Flare" was classified in subheading 6402.91.90, HTSUSA, the provision for "Other footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics: Other footwear: Covering the ankle: Other: Valued over $12/pair." The determination was based upon an examination of a sample identified as the "ATR Flare" and a fin
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.