Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-150098 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-150098, filed by Expeditors International, on behalf of their client, The Gap, Inc. Protestant claims the subject merchandise is eligible for preferential treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of eight entries of men’s and boy’s knit garments under subheadings 6110.20.2065 and subheading 6105.10.0030 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Reasoning
Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-150098 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-150098, filed by Expeditors International, on behalf of their client, The Gap, Inc. Protestant claims the subject merchandise is eligible for preferential treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of eight entries of men’s and boy’s knit garments under subheadings 6110.20.2065 and subheading 6105.10.0030 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 966896 (6110202065): Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-150098 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-150098, filed by Expeditors International, on behalf of their client, The Gap, Inc. Protestant claims the subject merchandise is eligible for preferential treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of eight entries of men’s and boy’s knit garments under subheadings 6110.20.2065 and subheading 6105.10.0030 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 611020
The tariff classification of two women’s garments from China
The tariff classification of a woman’s knitted garment from China.
The tariff classification of a woman’s knitted garment from China: applicability of HTSUS Chapter 61 Statistical Note 6.
The tariff classification of a women’s knitted garment from China; applicability of HTSUS Chapter 61 Statistical Note 6
The tariff classification of a women’s knitted garment from China; applicability of HTSUS Chapter 61 Statistical Note 6