Application for Further Review of Protest 3901-04-100384 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 3901-04-100384, filed by Hodes, Keating & Pilon, on behalf of Unilock Chicago, Inc.
Reasoning
Application for Further Review of Protest 3901-04-100384 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 3901-04-100384, filed by Hodes, Keating & Pilon, on behalf of Unilock Chicago, Inc.
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 967072 (8464909090): Application for Further Review of Protest 3901-04-100384 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 3901-04-100384, filed by Hodes, Keating & Pilon, on behalf of Unilock Chicago, Inc.
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 846490
The tariff classification of wet cleaning semiconductor equipment from Japan
The tariff classification of a stone splitting and treating system from Germany
The tariff classification of a tile cutter from China
The tariff classification of furnaces and other equipment from Canada
The tariff classification of scribing machines and machines for punching flexible printed circuit boards from Japan.