Protest 4601-03-200291/1001-01-100333; Faucet Aerators: Parts: Accessories Dear Port Director:This is our decision on protest 4601-03-200291/1001-01-100333 filed by counsel on behalf of NEOPERL Company, Inc., against your action regarding the classification, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA), of parts for faucet aerators. FACTS:The merchandise at issue was liquidated on January 5, 2001, and a protest with application for further review was filed on January 24, 2001. The protest was denied on December 13, 2002, but he denial was set aside under the authority of 19 U.S.C. 1515(d) at the request of the counsel for the protestant by letter, dated February 4, 2003. Under 19 U.S.C. 1515(d). Customs and Border Protection (CBP) "may on its own initiative, or pursuant to a written request by the protesting party filed with the appropriate port director within 90 days after the date of the protest denial, void the denial of the protest." After s

Cite this ruling

CBP Ruling 966477 (7419995010): Protest 4601-03-200291/1001-01-100333; Faucet Aerators: Parts: Accessories Dear Port Director:This is our decision on protest 4601-03-200291/1001-01-100333 filed by counsel on behalf of NEOPERL Company, Inc., against your action regarding the classification, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA), of parts for faucet aerators. FACTS:The merchandise at issue was liquidated on January 5, 2001, and a protest with application for further review was filed on January 24, 2001. The protest was denied on December 13, 2002, but he denial was set aside under the authority of 19 U.S.C. 1515(d) at the request of the counsel for the protestant by letter, dated February 4, 2003. Under 19 U.S.C. 1515(d). Customs and Border Protection (CBP) "may on its own initiative, or pursuant to a written request by the protesting party filed with the appropriate port director within 90 days after the date of the protest denial, void the denial of the protest." After s

Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.