Modification of NY J87067, dated August 22, 2003; Classification of boy’s athletic footwear Dear Ms. Kittel: This letter is in response to your request of April 7, 2004, for reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) J87067, dated August 22, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of boy’s athletic footwear from China. The footwear was classified in subheading 6402.99.80, HTSUSA, which provides for "footwear, in which both the upper’s and outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is not "sports footwear"; which does not cover the ankle; in which the upper’s external surface area measures over 90% rubber or plastics (including any accessories or reinforcements); which has a foxing or foxing-like band; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; and which is valued over $6.50, but not over $12.00 per pair." The determinati
Reasoning
Modification of NY J87067, dated August 22, 2003; Classification of boy’s athletic footwear Dear Ms. Kittel: This letter is in response to your request of April 7, 2004, for reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) J87067, dated August 22, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of boy’s athletic footwear from China. The footwear was classified in subheading 6402.99.80, HTSUSA, which provides for "footwear, in which both the upper’s and outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is not "sports footwear"; which does not cover the ankle; in which the upper’s external surface area measures over 90% rubber or plastics (including any accessories or reinforcements); which has a foxing or foxing-like band; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; and which is valued over $6.50, but not over $12.00 per pair." The determinati
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 967128 (64029918): Modification of NY J87067, dated August 22, 2003; Classification of boy’s athletic footwear Dear Ms. Kittel: This letter is in response to your request of April 7, 2004, for reconsideration of New York Ruling Letter (NY) J87067, dated August 22, 2003, as it pertains to the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) of boy’s athletic footwear from China. The footwear was classified in subheading 6402.99.80, HTSUSA, which provides for "footwear, in which both the upper’s and outer sole’s external surface is predominately rubber and/or plastics; which is not "sports footwear"; which does not cover the ankle; in which the upper’s external surface area measures over 90% rubber or plastics (including any accessories or reinforcements); which has a foxing or foxing-like band; which is not designed to be a protection against water, oil, or cold or inclement weather; and which is valued over $6.50, but not over $12.00 per pair." The determinati
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.