Application for Further Review of Protest 5501-05-100023Dear Port Director:This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review (AFR) of protest no. 5501-05-100023, filed by Sandler, Travis, & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Charles Komar & Sons, Inc.
Reasoning
Application for Further Review of Protest 5501-05-100023Dear Port Director:This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review (AFR) of protest no. 5501-05-100023, filed by Sandler, Travis, & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Charles Komar & Sons, Inc.
Cite this ruling
CBP Ruling 967712 (6208911010): Application for Further Review of Protest 5501-05-100023Dear Port Director:This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review (AFR) of protest no. 5501-05-100023, filed by Sandler, Travis, & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of Charles Komar & Sons, Inc.
Paste this into a product's override reason when citing this ruling as justification for a classification.
Other rulings for HS6 620891
The tariff classification of women’s pajama separates from Malaysia Dear Ms. Greener:
The tariff classification of a woman's sleep pant from Hong Kong
The tariff classification of women's pajama separates from India
The tariff classification of bath wraps from Turkey
The tariff classification of women’s woven pajama bottoms from India